Creator
For fragrance creators
This site counts bottles, not followers. If you review clones, the numbers here are the ones your audience asks for: what share of real owners called the pair close. Your reviews become checkable, and your name sits on them.
Claim your page
Creator accounts are claim-based. We invite, you claim. The invite is a signed one-time token, sent to you privately. Sign in with an email, paste the token, and your creator page flips to claimed on the spot. Route locked: nobody else can take your name in the roster after that.
Got a token already? Claim it here. No token yet? Keep reading; the invite list opens in waves.
What a claim gets you
- A public page with your name, your pickups, and your verdicts. People follow it from inside the census.
- Named citations. When your review covers a bottle in the catalogue, that bottle’s census page links your review with your name and your own closeness call, next to the numbers.
- Contact you can defend in the comments. Every claim on this site carries a labeled link to where it came from.
The standing rules
- No fan pages. Your page exists only because you claimed it, and a creator who never accepts the invite stays uncited. The roster only unlocks what you already published in the wild.
- No paid ranking. No one, you or a house, can buy a higher share or a better spot on a list. The numbers move only when votes move.
- Sponsorship is labeled. If a review ever runs as part of a paid arrangement with this site, it carries a visible partner tag. Paid content looks paid.
About money
The shop links on census pages earn nothing today. If that changes with affiliate partnerships, the written terms land here first, before the links do.
When the platform strikes the sentence
The crackdown on clone talk is documented. German courts ruled against dupe sellers, the top civil court settled the principle in April 2025, and further rulings landed through October 2026. TikTok blocked its biggest clone hashtag, #designerdupe. The one line a clone review stands on, “this smells like that,” is the line most at risk of disappearing.
That is a creator problem before it is anyone else’s. The review is yours, but the comparison inside it lives on a platform that can pull the sentence on a report. This site records the verdict with a date and a labeled source, and no platform owns the record. A clip can go down. The receipt stays here.
Why we built it this way
Clone reviews stress-test a promise: does this bottle actually smell like the original? Most of the internet answers with ad scroll. The census answers with the share of people who owned both bottles and said yes. Creators are the ones whose calls get quoted; a named, checkable citation is worth more than an anonymous one. That is the whole deal.